Brian Pratt responded: |
2020-09-14 08:10 |
Are these perhaps contained in the template file you're providing to Skyline?
Thanks for using the Skyline support board,
Brian Pratt
|
|
Brendan MacLean responded: |
2020-09-14 08:22 |
I doubt our code has any control over this. We are using a DLL (VerifyESkyline.dll) supplied by Waters to write the exported method. I have notified our contacts at Waters. Hopefully, we will hear back soon.
|
|
Brendan MacLean responded: |
2020-09-15 10:24 |
So, it is the Waters VerifyESkyline.dll which does this, but our Waters contacts point out that it has always been like this with those exact comments being used since 2013. It was apparently implemented like this to get around a limitation in the Waters Qanpedia software.
Unless this is causing some sort of blocking issue, I doubt we can get Waters to change it now.
--Brendan
|
|
mattkarasu responded: |
2020-09-15 10:36 |
Our issue with the comments is that it only allows the first five transitions to run. So if we want to do method development of 32 transitions per peptide and running them across 20 methods, it can take two hours to go through all comments and delete them. Deleting them allows all transitions to be scanned for. The first five comments in the editing page refer to quanpedia. The rest are appended by VerifyESkyline preventing them from being run.
|
|
Christopher Johnstone responded: |
2020-09-16 04:22 |
|
|