Two friendly suggestions | Nathan Manes | 2013-05-27 15:18 | |||||||||
1: Sometimes I run a peptide-concentration-curve series of replicates, and I get down to the limit of detection. Say I am targeting a peptide using 6 transitions, and that I have a replicate with a peptide abundance near the limit of detection, and say three of the transitions are useful, and the other three are too noisy and not used for quantitation. In the chromatogram of this precursor for this replicate, the noisy three transitions often will obscure the useful three, but I don't want to delete the noisy three transitions from the "Targets" pane (on the left) because they are useful for other replicates that have a greater concentration of the peptide. I suggest adding an option to only display the chromatograms of the transitions that are being used (for the replicate being viewed). Transitions that are not being used for this replicate wouldn't be deleted, just "hidden". 2: I run synthesized peptides when performing assay development. I suggest allowing users to add an annotation to replicates indicating if they are just peptide standards. If so indicated, then these relative transition intensities would replace the spectral library data when calculating R-squared values. Related: When importing results, Skyline attempts to identify the peptide peak. Is the R-squared value and the predicted elution time used for peak picking? I think so but it's hard for me to tell. If so, it might be good to make these factors stronger in the peak picking algorithm. I've seen some very strange peaks picked when the correct peak was "obvious", even with the latest version of Skyline (64-bit 1.4.0.4421). Thanks, and see you at the Skyline meeting at ASMS. |
|||||||||||
| |||||||||||