Issue 413: Keep optimization values from being negative

issues
Status:open
Assigned To:Kaipo Tamura
Type:Defect
Area:Skyline
Priority:2
Milestone:4.3
Opened:2015-04-26 12:24 by Brendan MacLean
Changed:2019-09-15 14:45 by Brendan MacLean
Resolved:
Resolution:
Closed:
2015-04-26 12:24 Brendan MacLean
Title»Keep optimization values from being negative
Assigned To»kaipot@u.washington.edu
Notify»nicolas drouin
Type»Defect
Area»Skyline
Priority»3
Milestone»3.2
Just as we were discussing for CoV, we should be limiting CE to some reasonable minimum, like 1 or 0.5. Then any set of steps that would result in a lower value should just get the minimum for as many steps as necessary. This is important for importing the results with each expected step being represented, and just repeating the minimum should not impact the optimal value. Though, we will also need to enforce the minimum in the calculation of optimized values, in case, for instance the 3rd minimal value ends up with the highest peak area. We don't want to end up choosing an optimal values that ends up negative, either.

2017-09-21 14:41 Kaipo Tamura
Priority3»2
Milestone3.2»4.1
Figure out whether this is still an issue and fix soon if it is.

2019-09-15 14:45 Brendan MacLean
Milestone4.1»