Brian Pratt responded: |
2019-08-01 07:24 |
Hi Malte,
If you can provide the Skyline document (use File > Share > Complete to create a .sky.zip file) and the raw Waters data, I am sure we can figure this out quickly. You can upload those to http://skyline.ms/files.url .
Best Regards,
Brian Pratt |
|
msielaff responded: |
2019-08-01 08:00 |
Dear Brian,
I uploaded the zipped skyline project and two test files of the mentioned format.
2019-029_skyline_project.sky.zip
O190713_10.raw.zip
O190713_14.raw.zip
Thank you very much for the fast response and your help!
Best regards
Malte |
|
Brian Pratt responded: |
2019-08-01 10:59 |
I think the only problem is that you indicated to Skyline that the data needs lockmass correction, in which case Skyline assumes that channel 3 is special. For the transition list you have, and the selection ions in the data (401.25 1023.5 754.93 461.2 652.91) it seems to be working properly when you don't ask for lockmass correction.
Best Regards,
Brian Pratt |
|
msielaff responded: |
2019-08-02 01:21 |
Hm, very interesting! How do the data look like when you import the raw files? Are the different channels displayed in the same chromatogram? I tried to import the raw data again and it still imports only the second channel (see attached screenshots). I also left the lockmass field empty when importing the data. Would it be possible to provide your Skyline document with all the imported channels? |
|
|
msielaff responded: |
2019-08-02 06:43 |
To exclude issues with other software / hardware configurations (see attached screenshot, system_information_1), I installed Skyline on another computer (system_information_2) and replicated the analysis. Unfortunately, Skyline still extracts information only from channel 2.
Best regards
Malte |
|
|
Brian Pratt responded: |
2019-08-02 07:10 |
Hi Malte,
Consider the selected ions in the raw data:
401.25
461.2
652.91
754.93
1023.5
And the precursor m/z values in your document:
460.776211
652.350271
754.866688
801.421342
1023.448344
1295.596799
and your Transition Settings > Instrument > Method Match Tolerance:
0.055
and you can see that only the 1023.448344 precursor can be expected to match the raw data:
460.776211 - 461.2 = -0.423789
652.350271 - 652.91 = -0.559729
754.866688 - 754.93 = -0.063312
1023.448344 - 1023.5 = -0.051656
Try increasing that match tolerance and you'll get more chromatograms.
Best,
Brian Pratt |
|
msielaff responded: |
2019-08-02 08:11 |
It works!!! It's the first time I work with targeted data and I never really considered the Method Match Tolerance parameter. Your support here is amazing! Thank you very much, Brian! |
|
Brian Pratt responded: |
2019-08-02 11:25 |
Ausgezeichnet! |
|